INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN VIRAL LOAD AND CELLULAR IMMUNITY IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19 OF VARYING SEVERITY.

Assessment of viral load levels in various biological samples taken from the respiratory tract can be an indicator of an ongoing process of active viral replication and may be used to monitor severe respiratory viral infections. The study of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 viral load and immunological laboratory parameters is an important step in the search for clinical markers of COVID-19. The aim of this research was to quantify viral load in patients with COVID-19 and to identify the relationship between viral load and changes in the parameters of the cellular component of the immune system. A laboratory examination was carried out on 74 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, they were divided into 3 groups based on the severity of the disease: mild, moderate, severe. Total viral load in clinical samples was determined by the number of SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per 100 copies of the reference RNaseP gene. A comprehensive assessment of the cellular component of the immune system was performed using flow cytometry and direct monoclonal antibodies, and the IL-6, and C-reactive protein concentrations were determined. We revealed a relationship between the development of serious clinical conditions in the patients with COVID-19, and the levels of viral load. High levels of viral RNA in biological samples correlate with main indicators of the T cell component of the immune system associated with disease severity. In a subgroup of patients with an extremely high viral load, strong positive correlations were found between the relative numbers of cytotoxic lymphocytes (CD3+CD8+), activated T lymphocytes (CD3+HLA-DR+), as well as absolute and relative numbers of activated B lymphocytes and NK cells (CD3-CD25+). Laboratory monitoring of the cellular component of the immune system, along with the assessment of viral loads, should improve early assessment of clinical condition in the patients with COVID-19. Changes in expression levels of activation markers on immune cells can be potentially viewed as indicators of recovery during COVID-19.Copyright © Nikitin Yu.V. et al., 2023 The article can be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN VIRAL LOAD AND CELLULAR IMMUNITY IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19 OF VARYING SEVERITY.

Assessment of viral load levels in various biological samples taken from the respiratory tract can be an indicator of an ongoing process of active viral replication and may be used to monitor severe respiratory viral infections. The study of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 viral load and immunological laboratory parameters is an important step in the search for clinical markers of COVID-19. The aim of this research was to quantify viral load in patients with COVID-19 and to identify the relationship between viral load and changes in the parameters of the cellular component of the immune system. A laboratory examination was carried out on 74 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, they were divided into 3 groups based on the severity of the disease: mild, moderate, severe. Total viral load in clinical samples was determined by the number of SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per 100 copies of the reference RNaseP gene. A comprehensive assessment of the cellular component of the immune system was performed using flow cytometry and direct monoclonal antibodies, and the IL-6, and C-reactive protein concentrations were determined. We revealed a relationship between the development of serious clinical conditions in the patients with COVID-19, and the levels of viral load. High levels of viral RNA in biological samples correlate with main indicators of the T cell component of the immune system associated with disease severity. In a subgroup of patients with an extremely high viral load, strong positive correlations were found between the relative numbers of cytotoxic lymphocytes (CD3+CD8+), activated T lymphocytes (CD3+HLA-DR+), as well as absolute and relative numbers of activated B lymphocytes and NK cells (CD3-CD25+). Laboratory monitoring of the cellular component of the immune system, along with the assessment of viral loads, should improve early assessment of clinical condition in the patients with COVID-19. Changes in expression levels of activation markers on immune cells can be potentially viewed as indicators of recovery during COVID-19.Copyright © Nikitin Yu.V. et al., 2023 The article can be used under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Clinical efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Aim: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy for patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Material(s) and Method(s): the study included 64 patients with laboratory-confirmed severe new coronavirus infection. The control group consisted of 58 patients who, in addition to standard therapy, received a transfusion of plasma from donors who had recovered from COVID-19. The effectiveness of immune plasma was assessed by the duration of fever, the level of oxygen (SpO2%) in dynamics, the detection of SARSCoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs using PCR method in dynamics, as well as by the dynamics of blood tests results. Adverse events (any medically adverse events that occurred after immune plasma transfusion) were recorded as safety criteria. Result(s): patients who received convalescent plasma, showed a significantly shorter period of SARS-CoV-2 replication compared with the control group. The use of immune plasma did not have a statistically significant effect on the duration of the fever, as well as the dynamics of blood oxygenation. Also, there were no significant differences compared with the control group when assessing blood tests parameters. Conclusion(s): The use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma to treat severe COVID-19 did not show significant clinical effect but reduced the period of viral replication. It also showed no unexpected or serious adverse events.Copyright © 2022 Interregional public organization Association of infectious disease specialists of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region (IPO AIDSSPbR). All rights reserved.

Clinical efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Aim: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy for patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Material(s) and Method(s): the study included 64 patients with laboratory-confirmed severe new coronavirus infection. The control group consisted of 58 patients who, in addition to standard therapy, received a transfusion of plasma from donors who had recovered from COVID-19. The effectiveness of immune plasma was assessed by the duration of fever, the level of oxygen (SpO2%) in dynamics, the detection of SARSCoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs using PCR method in dynamics, as well as by the dynamics of blood tests results. Adverse events (any medically adverse events that occurred after immune plasma transfusion) were recorded as safety criteria. Result(s): patients who received convalescent plasma, showed a significantly shorter period of SARS-CoV-2 replication compared with the control group. The use of immune plasma did not have a statistically significant effect on the duration of the fever, as well as the dynamics of blood oxygenation. Also, there were no significant differences compared with the control group when assessing blood tests parameters. Conclusion(s): The use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma to treat severe COVID-19 did not show significant clinical effect but reduced the period of viral replication. It also showed no unexpected or serious adverse events.Copyright © 2022 Interregional public organization Association of infectious disease specialists of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region (IPO AIDSSPbR). All rights reserved.

SARS-CoV-2 severity prediction in young adults using artificial intelligence.

Aim: to build, a predictive model for severe COVID-19 prediction in young adults using deep learning methods. Material(s) and Method(s): data from 906 medical records of patients aged. 18 to 44 years with laboratory-confirmed SARS- CoV-2 infection during 2020-2021 period, was analyzed. Evaluation of laboratory and. instrumental data was carried out using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The level of statistical significance was p<0,05. The neural network was trained, using the Pytorch. framework. Result(s): in patients with mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection, peripheral oxygen saturation, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, hematocrit, serum, iron, transferrin, and. absolute peripheral blood, eosinophil and. lymphocyte counts were significantly higher than in patients with severe SOVID-19 (p< 0,001). The values of the absolute number of neutrophils, ESR, glucose, ALT, AST, CPK, urea, LDH, ferritin, CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer, respiration rate, heart rate, blood, pressure in the group of patients with mild and. moderate severity were statistically significantly lower than in the group of severe patients (p < 0.001). Eleven indicators were identified as predictors of severe COVID-19 (peripheral oxygen level, peripheral blood erythrocyte count, hemoglobin level, absolute eosinophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, LDH, ferritin, C-reactive protein, D-dimer levels) and. their threshold, values. A model intended, to predict COVID-19 severity in young adults was built. Conclusion. The values of laboratory and instrumental indicators obtained in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection upon admission significantly differ. Among them, eleven indicators were significantly associated with the development of a severe COVID-19. A predictive model based, on artificial intelligence method, with high, accuracy predicts the likelihood, of severe SARS-CoV-2 course development in young adults.Copyright © 2022 Interregional public organization Association of infectious disease specialists of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region (IPO AIDSSPbR). All rights reserved.

SARS-CoV-2 severity prediction in young adults using artificial intelligence

Aim: to build, a predictive model for severe COVID-19 prediction in young adults using deep learning methods. Materials and methods: data from 906 medical records of patients aged. 18 to 44 years with laboratory-confirmed SARS- CoV-2 infection during 2020—2021 period, was analyzed. Evaluation of laboratory and. instrumental data was carried out using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The level of statistical significance was p<0,05. The neural network was trained, using the Pytorch. framework. Results: in patients with mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection, peripheral oxygen saturation, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, hematocrit, serum, iron, transferrin, and. absolute peripheral blood, eosinophil and. lymphocyte counts were significantly higher than in patients with severe СOVID-19 (p< 0,001). The values of the absolute number of neutrophils, ESR, glucose, ALT, AST, CPK, urea, LDH, ferritin, CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer, respiration rate, heart rate, blood, pressure in the group of patients with mild and. moderate severity were statistically significantly lower than in the group of severe patients (p < 0.001). Eleven indicators were identified as predictors of severe COVID-19 (peripheral oxygen level, peripheral blood erythrocyte count, hemoglobin level, absolute eosinophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, LDH, ferritin, C-reactive protein, D-dimer levels) and. their threshold, values. A model intended, to predict COVID-19 severity in young adults was built. Conclusion. The values of laboratory and instrumental indicators obtained in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection upon admission significantly differ. Among them, eleven indicators were significantly associated with the development of a severe COVID-19. A predictive model based, on artificial intelligence method, with high, accuracy predicts the likelihood, of severe SARS-CoV-2 course development in young adults. © 2022 Interregional public organization Association of infectious disease specialists of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region (IPO AIDSSPbR). All rights reserved.

SARS-CoV-2 severity prediction in young adults using artificial intelligence.

Aim: to build, a predictive model for severe COVID-19 prediction in young adults using deep learning methods. Material(s) and Method(s): data from 906 medical records of patients aged. 18 to 44 years with laboratory-confirmed SARS- CoV-2 infection during 2020-2021 period, was analyzed. Evaluation of laboratory and. instrumental data was carried out using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The level of statistical significance was p<0,05. The neural network was trained, using the Pytorch. framework. Result(s): in patients with mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection, peripheral oxygen saturation, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, hematocrit, serum, iron, transferrin, and. absolute peripheral blood, eosinophil and. lymphocyte counts were significantly higher than in patients with severe SOVID-19 (p< 0,001). The values of the absolute number of neutrophils, ESR, glucose, ALT, AST, CPK, urea, LDH, ferritin, CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer, respiration rate, heart rate, blood, pressure in the group of patients with mild and. moderate severity were statistically significantly lower than in the group of severe patients (p < 0.001). Eleven indicators were identified as predictors of severe COVID-19 (peripheral oxygen level, peripheral blood erythrocyte count, hemoglobin level, absolute eosinophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, LDH, ferritin, C-reactive protein, D-dimer levels) and. their threshold, values. A model intended, to predict COVID-19 severity in young adults was built. Conclusion. The values of laboratory and instrumental indicators obtained in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection upon admission significantly differ. Among them, eleven indicators were significantly associated with the development of a severe COVID-19. A predictive model based, on artificial intelligence method, with high, accuracy predicts the likelihood, of severe SARS-CoV-2 course development in young adults.Copyright © 2022 Interregional public organization Association of infectious disease specialists of Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region (IPO AIDSSPbR). All rights reserved.

Prospects of using the nucleoside analogue riamilovir in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

AIM: To evaluate clinical efficacy of nucleoside analogues in therapy of moderate COVID-19 in in-patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective processing of 108 completed clinical cases with moderate novel coronavirus disease was carried out for the period 2020-2021. The duration of the disease at the time of admission did not exceed three days. Experimental group consisted of 53 patients who, in addition to standard therapy, were prescribed "off-label" riamilovir at a daily dosage of 1250 mg for 5 days by the decision of the medical commission. Comparison group included 55 patients who received a combination of umifenovir and ribavirin as antiviral therapy for 5 days. The duration of the main clinical manifestations of the disease, the indicators of clinical and biochemical blood tests, results of the SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA study using the nucleic acid amplification method (NAAT diagnostics). RESULTS: Significantly faster achievement of clinical improvement in the group of patients treated with riamilovir was shown, as well as faster sanitation from SARS-CoV-2 virus based on the results of etiological testing. CONCLUSION: The use of riamilovir for the treatment of patients with moderate novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) resulted in a significant reduction of general infectious syndromes and respiratory symptoms. Patients from the experimental group significantly faster achieved clinical recovery and sanitation from the pathogen according to the results of NAAT diagnostics.

Monocytosis in patients with Coronavirus pneumonia on the background of treatment with glucocorticoids

Features of variation of peripheral blood leukocyte formula parameters in 86 patients with coronavirus pneumonia with leukocytosis with a background of glucocorticoid treatment were investigated. All patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 was 22 individuals who showed clinical signs of the bacterial infection (purulent sputum cough in combination with neutrophilic leukocytosis at hospital the admission). The 2nd group was made up of 64 patients with the glucocorticoids developed against the background of treatment with glucocorticoids (dexamethasone 20 mg/day or prednisolone 150 mg/day, intravenously for 3 days) leukocytosis >10 x109/l without signs of a bacterial infection. It was found that in patients of the 1st group compared to the 2nd group, levels of the white blood cells and neutrophils were significantly (p < 0.001) exceeded the reference values in the absence of a significant change in the number of monocytes. In patients of the 2nd group after a three-day intravenous application of the glucocorticoids on the 4th day of hospitalization, a statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase in the number of neutrophils and monocytes was established. When comparing the quantitative parameters of the leukocyte formula between the 2nd group on the 4th day of the hospitalization and the 1st group at admission, there were no differences in the level of leukocytes and neutrophils. Number of monocytes in group 2 (1.11 (0.90;1.34) x 109/l), on the contrary, statistically significantly (p < 0.001) exceeded their level in the 1st group (0.59 (0.50;0.77) x 109/l). Thus, an indicator of the number of monocytes in the peripheral blood could be a promising differential diagnostic criterion for the genesis of the leukocytosis in patients with the COVID-19. This parameter may be one of the factors influencing the decision to prescribe the antibacterial therapy.

Effect of azoximer bromide on the severity of clinical manifestations in patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection

We are now observing a constantly growing number of patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection who have active complains for more than 12 weeks. Long-term consequences of the disease significantly impair the quality of life and lead to an overburdened healthcare system, which, in the absence of effective therapeutic strategies, has a significant impact on the quality of medical care. This article discusses the main aspects of pathogenesis and clinical characteristics of post-COVID syndrome, as well as the experience of pharmacological correction of this condition. Objective. To evaluate the effect of azoximer bromide on the resolution of post-COVID syndrome by assessing the duration and severity of the main symptoms within 10 days since treatment initiation, as well as the level of chronic fatigue. Patients and methods. This study included 90 patients (both males and females). The experimental group comprised 55 individuals who received azoximer bromide for 10 days according to the package insert. The control group included 35 individuals who received no therapy. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using special questionnaires;Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis. Results. We found that significantly fewer patients from the experimental group had joint and muscle pain and headache on day 10 of the experiment than patients in the control group. Hyposmia was also less common in the experimental group then in controls by day 10. There was a significant decrease in the severity of headache, joint and muscle pain, attention impairment, dizziness, anosmia among patients receiving azoximer bromide by day 10 compared to those receiving no therapy. Patients in the experimental group also demonstrated significantly less severe fatigue compared to controls as early as day 5 of the experiment. No adverse events were registered during the study. Conclusion. Azoximer bromide demonstrated its clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of post-COVID syndrome. © 2021, Dynasty Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of the Preventive Efficacy and Safety of Azoximer Bromide in Healthcare Workers in Contact with Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19

Relevance. Despite the implementation of measures to reduce morbidity and mortality among medical workers who are in contact with patients hospitalized for a new coronavirus infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 (hereinafter – COVID-19), their level remains high today. Given the difficulty of achieving the required number of vaccinated to form collective immunity, the issue of finding additional drug-based ways to prevent COVID-19, especially in risk groups, becomes urgent. Aims. To evaluate the effect of azoximer bromide on the number of cases of confirmed COVID-19 disease among medical workers, as well as on the level of chronic fatigue in the study groups. Materials and methods: 78 men and women were included in the study. The experimental group consisted of 41 people who took azoximer bromide for 38 days. The comparison group consisted of 37 people who were not prescribed azoximer bromide. The epidemiological efficacy of the drug was evaluated. Statistical evaluation of the significance of the differences was carried out using the Student's t-test, Pearson's criterion χ2. Results. The number of study participants with COVID-19 in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the comparison group. A significantly faster reduction of manifestations of chronic fatigue syndrome was noted in study participants who took azoximer bromide. There were no adverse events during the administration of the studied drug by the study participants. Conclusions. Azoximer bromide has shown epidemiological efficacy when used by medical workers directly providing medical care to patients with COVID-19 (when working in the «red zone»), including contributing to the more rapid normalization of the psychological state of medical workers. © Kasyanenko KV, et al.

Oxygen-helium gas mixture «Heliox» for the treatment of respiratory failure in patients with new coronavirus infection Covid-19 (randomized single-center controlled trial)

IntRoDuCtIon Treatment of respiratory failure in pneumonia caused by coronavirus infection (COVID-19) is still an unsolved problem that requires a comprehensive approach and the development of new methods that expand the range of possibilities of modern therapy. There is evidence that the heated oxygen-helium mixture has a positive effect on gas exchange in the infiltration zone by improving both ventilation and diffusion. AIM oF StuDY To evaluate the effectiveness of the inclusion of a heated oxygen-helium mixture HELIOX (70% Helium/ 30% Oxygen) in the complex intensive care of respiratory failure of pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAteRIAL AnD MethoDS The study included 60 patients with confirmed viral pneumonia caused by COVID-19. The patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 (n=30) — patients who were treated with the standard COVID-19 treatment protocol with the heated oxygen-helium mixture HELIOX, and group 2 (control) (n=30) — patients who received standard therapy. Lethality was studied for 28 days, the time in days until a steady increase in SpO2>96% was achieved when breathing atmospheric air;the time until the patient is transferred from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the general department. ReSuLtS Inhalation of the HELIOX mixture (70% Helium / 30% Oxygen) resulted in a faster recovery of the hemoglobin oxygen saturation index (SpO2). Starting from day 3, these differences became statistically significant. The time in days from inclusion in the study to a persistent increase in the degree of oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SpO2>96%) when breathing atmospheric air in the group with inhalation of the HELIOX mixture was less — 8 (7;10), compared to 10 (8;13) in the control group (p=0.006). In the group with inhaled HELIOX mixture, the median treatment time in the ICU was 8 (7;9.5) days vs 13 (8;17) days (p<0.001) in the comparison group. ConCLuSIonS Inhalation of the HELIOX mixture (70% Helium / 30% Oxygen) led to a faster recovery of the hemoglobin oxygen saturation index SpO2, which contributed to reduction in the duration of oxygen therapy and a decrease in mortality. © 2021 Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine. All rights reserved.

Electron microscopic changes in the nasal membrane of patients with CoVID-19 depending on the clinical form and the period of the disease

Given that COVID-19 is a global public health problem and that almost all countries in the world have been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, research is being actively pursued to better understand the effects of the virus on human cells. However, it is not clear what changes are observed in the cells of the main gate of infection – the mucosa of the mouth and the nose at different clinical forms and at different periods of disease. Understanding the ultra-structural cell changes of SARS-CoV-2 targets may help clarify the pathogenic aspects of infection in the lower respiratory tract. In this study, the elements of the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the cells of the respiratory epithelium of the nose in patients with COVID-19 were evaluated using electron microscopy for the purpose of detecting the peculiarities of viral activity depending on the form and period of disease. Bioptats of the nasal mucous membrane were taken from COVID-19 patients and subsequently examined by electron microscopy. The severity of structural changes in tissue samples, presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in cells were determined, then bioptats were grouped according to the clinical form of the infection process (inapparent, acute upper respiratory tract infections, viral lung disease) and period of disease. It has been established that the most characteristic changes in the mucous membrane of the nose were observed in the first week of infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 and occurring in the form of acute respiratory disease, while viral lung infections have had the highest virus density in vesicles within cells, the formation of smooth virus-free vesicles is most common in inapparent forms. The data obtained may indicate that the formation of classical virus-induced changes in the respiratory epithelium of the nose mucous (vesicles with viral particles and signs of their release from the cell) is characteristic of localized forms of infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 (respiratory infection of the upper respiratory tract) and in cases of generalized infection (viral infection of the lungs and probably other organs and systems) accumulation of the infectious agent in high concentrations in vesicles.

Clinical efficiency and safety of riamiiovir for treating patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection

Aim. The study evaluates clinical effectiveness and safety of etiotropic antiviral medications with a direct mechanism of action (Riamiiovir, Ribavirin, Umifenovir) for the treatment of moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults. Materials and methods. The study used the data from 59 health records of patients with moderate PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Control group included 29 patients treated with 1250 mg Riamiiovir off-label per day for 5 days (250 mg 5 times a day), comparison group consisted of 30 patients, who received 800 mg Ribavirin and Umifenovir per day for 5 days. The effectiveness of the medications was assessed by the duration and severity of general infectious and respiratory syndromes, anosmia and ageusia, as well as the oxygen content in the blood, the timing of SARS-COV-2 virus elimination from the body according to the results of control studies of nasopharyngeal swabs using the PCR method and dynamics of blood tests results. Results. A statistically significant decrease in the duration of fever, cough, and anosmia and a more rapid elimination of the virus from the body were noted in the group of patients receiving Riamiiovir. Decreased levels of non-specific inflammatory markers in blood serum, as well as normal values of liver enzymes were observed in control group during therapy, as opposed to the comparison group. No serious adverse events were noted when using the medication. Conclusion. Nucleoside analogue medication Riamiiovir showed good effectiveness and safety profile in adult patients with moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Optimization of diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using polymerase chain reaction in a large multi-specialty hospital

We consider the possibility of optimizing the diagnosis of infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 using polymerase chain reaction in a multi-specialty hospital, repurposed for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, using the example Of the military medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov. The analysis of scientific publications selected in accordance with the purpose of the study, analyzed data from 218 samples of polymerase chain reaction in patients with COVID-19, who were in the clinics Of the military medical Academy named after Sm. Time intervals were established depending on the clinical forms and severity of the infectious process, in which the probability of a positive and negative result of a polymerase chain reaction to SARS-CoV-2 RNA was maximum and minimum. It was shown that during the examination and treatment, molecular biological diagnostics were performed excessively (4 times in more than 50% of patients) and in 97,3% of patients unreasonably early (8,5+or-0,4 days). At the same time, the highest frequency of negative results of polymerase chain reaction to SARS-CoV-2 RNA was observed in the period from 9 to 10 and from 12 to 14 days, while it depended on the clinical form and severity of the infectious process. In this regard, the volume diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction should be reduced and to conduct research when entering the hospital, on the 9th-10th day (in patients inapparently forms and acute respiratory diseases, lung flow) and 12-14 days before discharge in patients with moderate and severe course of the infectious process.

[Evaluation of the effectiveness of Riamilovir in the complex therapy of patients with COVID-19].

AIM: In this study we evaluated the effects of Riamilovir on SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding and on admission duration in patients with moderate COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have used data from 69 health records of patients with moderate severe PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Control group included 34 patients treated with off-label riamilovir 1250 mg per day for 5 days (250 mg 5 times a day), comparison groups 35 patients, who received ribavirin and umifenovir 800 mg a day for 5 days. The antiviral therapy was administered within 72 hours from the onset of the disease. The primary endpoints were elimination of virus in oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs on 7 day of admission and discharge from the hospital by 14 day. RESULTS: Patients assigned to riamilovir had significantly shorter time to clinical improvement as well as increased PCR negative rate by day 7. CONCLUSION: Yearly administration of riamilovir as opposed to the umifenovir and ribavirin in therapy of moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with significant shorter time to clinical improvement by 14 day of hospitalization. PCR negative rate by 7 days of hospitalization is significantly more likely in riamilovir group.

Clinical efficacy and safety of nebulized prostacyclin in patients with sARs-CoV-2 (prospective comparative study)

Aim. In this study we evaluated clinical effectiveness and safety of nebulized prostacyclin in patients with Novel Coronavirus Disease (SARS-CoV-2). Materials and methods: We have included 44 male patients with moderate PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in this study. Control group consisted of 23 patients treated with nebulized prostacyclin (PGI2). besides standard therapy. We compared intensiveness and duration of infectious intoxication syndrome, duration of fever, cough as well as SpO2 level, complete blood count and chemokine status values. Results: Statistically significant difference in duration of fever, cough, intensiveness and duration of infectious intoxication syndrome were observed. Lymphocyte and platelet counts were significantly higher in control group We have also noticed significantly lower level of proinflammatory mediators and C4-complement component in control group. Only 1 adverse effect associated with inhaled prostacyclin was reported. Conclusion. Nebulized prostacyclin showed therapeutic efficacy and good safety profile in adults with moderate CO-VID-19.